On Sun, 2014-09-14 at 13:41 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: […] > I installed "ldc" from the Package thingy (GUI), which means having used > yum in the background, I guess. The exact version currently used is > > ldc-2-57.20140305git6e908ff.fc20 (32-bit)
I guessed as much and so did the same for one of my machines – though I am using the 64-bit packages. With the latest pull request, I believe I have solved all the issues – including ones that were not being picked up by the CI :-) […] > I think the question is more like: How should the actual "ldc" Tool > behave? What should happen when a user has a version of "ldc" installed > in his system, but tries to build a project with dynamic libs involved? It gets more complicated than that :-( On the other hand it gets a lot simpler: it has been stated that ldc doesn't work with shared libraries as yet. I have therefore skipped the tests, which is currently the correct behaviour. For now ldc only handles static libraries and those tests all pass: at least on OSX, Fedora 20 and Debian Sid. It will be good to see the effect on the CI. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
