On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 12:17 +0100, Russel Winder wrote: > On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 20:46 +0200, Dirk Bächle wrote: > > On 16.09.2014 09:39, Arve Knudsen wrote: > > > > > > CLion is supposed to support more build tools in the future, I've been > > > told. Maybe put some pressure on them to support SCons (via their > > > forums f.ex.)? > > > > > Building up pressure is the wrong approach, we could simply offer them > > our help...if they should be interested to add some basic SCons support > > to their tools. > > I have asked a question http://devnet.jetbrains.com/thread/457064 > > Let's see what the response is: it may be that the whole of CLion is > being engineered around CMake, and so would disallow Make and Autotools > as well. Or it may be that they are just using CMake for now and will > allow plugable alternatives.
JetBrains have accepted the idea of alternate build frameworks and are asking for opinions regarding support for SCons: http://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-1102 As always, vote early and definitely vote often. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
