William, Of course your vote counts! It's open source.
-Bill p.s. Plus you have a good first name so I give it a little more weight :) On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 4:45 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 3:14 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 20.05.2015 20:35, Bill Deegan wrote: >> >>> Could we push default as is as 2.3.5, and then merge slots and push that >>> in a couple weeks? >>> Then we could branch default as 2.3 prior to merge of slots? >>> >> >> Sure, I have no objections to that. After 2.3.5 we could also branch out >> from default to a "2.4" branch, and then merge the "slots" stuff only on >> that branch as a first step. So we would never risk to "taint" our trunk >> with merges that would be kind of hard to undo. >> If no problems show up with 2.4 we could then still merge it again to >> default, and continue from there towards 2.5 and 3.x. Just as an idea... > > > I think this is a good idea. Risk mitigation plus consistency with the > SCons version numbers~! > > Not that my vote counts ;) > > V/R, > William > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
