I don't have the time/energy/desire to continue working on a system that is unsustainable for us, and seems to be getting more so. If you'd like to push on it, feel free.
-- Gary On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 8:25 AM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> wrote: > Can they be more accurate where exactly the vulnerability is? IIRC we > have 1.9.8 version (latest) installed, so if there is an exploit, the > upstream should be notified too. > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Pair said it was an exploited attack on the wiki script itself this time, > > which is worse. Usually it's "just" excessive load due to spammers > trying > > to create pages, which is basically a DoS. > > > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 3:13 AM, anatoly techtonik <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 7:56 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > Wiki is down again due to invalid permissions. I assume more DOS > >> > attacks. > >> > We should consider changing providers or something... > >> > >> First, let's have some proof that it is DOS attack. Do you have access > >> to logs and > >> statistics? > >> > >> -- > >> anatoly t. > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Scons-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Gary > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Scons-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > > > -- > anatoly t. > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > -- Gary
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
