Hi,
On 18.06.2015 16:58, Bill Deegan wrote:
All,
Should we migrate off sourceforge.net <http://sourceforge.net> as download host?
They're getting bad reputation for inserting crapware in their hosted windows
installers..
I'm against panicking, and spreading further FUD. Do we have concrete evidence
that the SCons Windows installers are actually affected?
Even if they are, we could still contact SourceForge and ask them to not do
it...or then we'll migrate away.
But as far as I understood from pages like:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6262347
http://www.expertreviews.co.uk/software/1403408/the-beginning-of-the-end-for-crapware-installers
https://notepad-plus-plus.org/news/notepad-plus-plus-leaves-sf.html
the owner of the project has to agree that SF wraps the downloads, and I don't
think we've taken this step in the past, or have we?
SF just offers a whole lot of infrastructure (download, statistics, ...) for
free, and a real alternative isn't really in sight. So
we should try to stick with it. We can still offer the packages on bitbucket in
parallel and point users (which might be concerned
about SFs policies) to it. So it gets their choice, not ours...
Just my 2 cents.
Best regards,
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Scons-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
