+1 on using SCons test framework for any contrib tool tests. On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-07-05 at 13:17 -0400, William Blevins wrote: > > > […] > > Most of the wiki tools are rather simple. I'm not sure I see the > > harm in > > going from scons-contrib -> SCons core directly provided there are > > tests. > > Though that brings up another question. Since all the SCons test > > framework > > only exists in the core repo, in what form should tests for > > contributed > > code exist? > […] > > Dirk created a test framework for standalone tools, so I think we > demand that be used. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
