Just as a side note though, the only builds that this *should* rebuild are builds with more complete dependencies, so I'm not sure if it would affect the average user.
V/R, William On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 11:15 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > SCons can now find cross-language dependencies, so it is possible that the > number of children will change. This will indeed force a rebuild. > > V/R, > William > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> William, >> >> It seems likely that since the change to scanning behavior will likely >> change many builds (as it's more accurate in tracing dependencies). >> >> As such I think we should pre-announce it. >> >> Is it safe to say this change "breaks compatibility"? >> (If you ran a build to completion without change, and reran it you'd get >> a new build, switch to this change and it may rebuild some files) >> >> -Bill >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:16 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Once we have finalized the patch, so that the behavioral changes can be >>> concretely defined, I will update those two files or should we do a >>> pre-release announcement like with the slots changes? >>> >>> V/R, >>> William >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> William, >>>> >>>> I just got around to doing a thorough read of your pull request and >>>> added a couple comments. >>>> >>>> Notably c++ doe (in the standard) support and require usage of header >>>> files with no extension: >>>> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header >>>> >>>> Another item is that since this is a change in functionality, >>>> documentation will need updates. >>>> And we should probably put a section in the src/CHANGES.txt and >>>> src/RELEASE.txt >>>> >>>> -Bill >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:18 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:56 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> <Likely going off-topic…> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 2015-07-09 at 00:20 -0400, William Blevins wrote: >>>>>> > Thanks for responding everyone. I just wanted a "heart beat" so to >>>>>> > speak, >>>>>> >>>>>> You could always play the start of Dark Side of the Moon ;-) >>>>>> >>>>>> > since I wasn't sure how many members were watching the devs list. >>>>>> > I'm not >>>>>> > asking anyone to stop what they are doing, but a lot of what I have >>>>>> > left is >>>>>> > requirements related questions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Whilst I note every email, I mostly delete and move on due to not >>>>>> having enough time to properly contribute. >>>>>> >>>>>> > I will hopefully still be able to work on SCons after early >>>>>> > September, but >>>>>> > I am going to be a little disorganized during the move and culture >>>>>> > adjustment. I will be overseas for a year getting my MSc in Great >>>>>> > Britain. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just to note that Great Britain is a geographic but not political >>>>>> entity, something the ISO committees handing out country codes chose >>>>>> to >>>>>> forget when trying to solve the UK/Ukraine problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> Where will you be studying and living when here? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> University of Sussex in Brighton; approximately Sept 2015 - Sept 2016. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> > Also, I may not have my high-end workstation. I'm still debating >>>>>> > whether or >>>>>> > not I want to break it down and ship it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I guess this depends on cost. It always seems that countries shipping >>>>>> to UK pay about 0.5 or 0.3 the cost of shipping the same from the UK. >>>>>> Basically all companies (especially USA ones) charge far more in the >>>>>> UK >>>>>> for everything than they charge anywhere else in the world. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cost plus risk of it getting damaged. I generally build my own >>>>> workstations, so it's not like shipping X-U server form-factored machines. >>>>> I will have to dismantle it prior to shipping. I'm tempted to ship it >>>>> case >>>>> less and buy another one in Britain because it'll be cheaper than shipping >>>>> (probably). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Russel. >>>>>> >>>>>> ============================================================================= >>>>>> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >>>>>> sip:[email protected] >>>>>> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
