Bill, When I try to run the doc generator, I get something similar. I am using the standard tools from Debian 8.
Dirk, What platform and tool versions are you using? V/R, William On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > On 30.07.2015 00:30, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> Dirk (and anyone who understands the doc toolchain), >> >> I've run: >> >> python bin/docs-update-generated.py >> python bin/docs-validate.py >> python bin/docs-create-example-outputs.py >> >> Per our release procedure working on getting 2.3.5 out. >> >> [...] >> Here's diff for functions.gen >> https://pastebin.mozilla.org/8841011 >> >> (pretty much all the files have a diff, but I'm not sure they're an issue) >> >> Are any of these differences important? >> >> > I'll make this a "yes". The problem here is that the special XML tags like > "example_commands" don't exist in the standard "Docbook" namespace, but > only in the "http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0"; namespace referring to the > extended "SCons Docbook". If you leave out these specifications > > xmlns="http://www.scons.org/dbxsd/v1.0"; > > this may lead to errors during processing later. Even when you don't see > it at first while creating a PDF or EPUB directly, users might not be able > to directly edit the XML files with an editor like XmlMind or SernaFree. > > Can you try and find out why your XML processing chain omits the namespace > definition within the single XML tags? > > Best regards, > > Dirk > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
