I'm not sure what I am talking about either. I think I got email chains mixed up...
I don't see any reasons not to do 2.4.0 with slots. V/R, William On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> wrote: > William, > > I'm not sure what you are talking about? > My question was just weather the dev list folks thought there was any > reason to hold off releasing default which has the slots changes in it. > > There's no plan or mention of your changes in the email.. > -Bill > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:57 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I see releasing cross language support separately as less risk. If there >> are issues, then they can be more easily associated with the correct change >> sets. We still haven't made an email announcement either. I don't expect >> problems, but I find being the pessimist wins battles by simply not having >> to fight them. >> >> The only reason I could see for not doing them separately is because of >> the release overhead, and that is outside my pay grade ;) >> >> V/R, >> William >> >> On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Any reasons not to push out 2.4.0 with the slots changes? >>> >>> -Bill >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
