Jason, As I see it SCons 3.0 main feature would be that it would run on python 2.7.x and 3.x (same source/installer for both)
-Bill On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Jason Kenny <[email protected]> wrote: > Is SCons 3 main feature, python 3 support? > Jason > ------------------------------ > From: Bill Deegan <[email protected]> > Sent: 9/25/2015 5:56 PM > To: SCons developer list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Scons-dev] SCons.. the road ahead > > I guess the question is should that happen in 3.0 branch or default. > Since most likely it's in the core and not in the tools, I'm guessing none > of the outstanding pull requests will touch that.. > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Alexandre Feblot <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > Wasn't Dirk speaking of first cleaning some 2.6-ish code? > > *--* > Alexandre Feblot > > Le 26 sept. 2015 à 00:02, William Blevins <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:50 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Greetings, > > Here's what I'm thinking (Note I'm explicitly not discussing any > infrastructure changes here, bugtracker, git vs hg, etc, so please do not > chime in in this thread on those issues) > > 1) Merge any fairly trivial pull requests currently outstanding to default > branch > 2) Release 2.4.1 (And push to pypi) > 3) Merge cross language scanner pull request. > 4) Release 2.5.0 (and push to pypi) > > > I follow you up to here. > > > 5) Merge 3.0 branch to default and finish that once and for all. > > > Is this part high risk? I assume that the 3.0 branch is still 2.7 > compliant. If it is then, it should be fine. > > > Yes the codebase should be Python 2.7.x and 3.x compat (where x is TBD but > most likely .10 and .3? respectively). > No Python 3.x only SCons for the foreseeable future, at least in my mind. > Enough people are stuck at that with platforms they need to support for a > while. > > > > Then I don't see any issues with this path forward. > > > > > > 6) Release a beta for 3.0 > 7) Release 3.0 > > Thoughts? > > -Bill > SCons Project Co-Manager > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
