Gary, For this test I ended up just having the full expected output, in this case I effectively checked for the output not being there. It worked for the negative case because the output is pretty short.
Can you use must_not_contain on stdout? I'm thinking our test framework docs are pretty sparse. -Bill On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> wrote: > Can you just have two tests, one must_contain() and the other > must_not_contain()? > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Greetings, >> >> I'm looking through the test logic and I don't see a way to say: >> 1) Output must have xyz in it >> 2) AND must NOT have abc in it >> >> I'm working on a test for the append flag for Help() and depending on >> it's setting the output from >> scons -h >> >> should or shouldn't contain help from AddOption()'s. >> >> I could specify the exact full output expected, but it would seem easier >> to maintain if I only check for 1 and 2 above. >> >> Thanks, >> Bill >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > > -- > Gary > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
