Dirk, I think we've given enough notice that pre 2.7 is going to be dropped. I'll take a pass through the updated pull request (#284) and merge it, unless someone has serious issues with doing so.
-Bill On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi there, > > On 11.12.2015 22:39, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> +1 on waiting for Dirks pull request to land. >> He has a couple items to add before it's complete. >> He said he'll be working on them over the weekend. >> Might be done by Tuesday.. >> >> > I've updated my pull request with an additional commit. So, short of a > final review, it should be ready to get merged... > > I'd like to raise one question though: What about the integration of the > "stubprocess.py" wrapper? Wasn't this planned for the next release 2.5? If > we want to keep it this way, it might be better to *not* merge my PR into > "trunk" right now, but only onto the python3 branch directly. > Like this, we could work on the "stubprocess" thingy, merge it to "trunk" > first, and only then put PR#284 on top. This would give us the opportunity > to release a 2.5 with the "stubprocess.py" speedup, but still (some) > backward compatibility to Python 2.6...so more users could benefit from > this? > > Just as an idea... > > Best regards, > > Dirk > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
