On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-01-09 at 14:09 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote: > > > […] > > I would also like to make us a clear statement first, about what we > > want to change/migrate and why we want to do it. I'm currently > > trying to find examples of large open-source projects (not some small > > repos, maintained by a single person) that have moved from > > Mercurial to git. Can anyone give pointers? > > My goal here is to analyze the log/commit history in order to find > > out whether the migration actually did have a measurable effect > > on things like "frequency of commits per month", "LOC touched per > > month", "new committers per month" and so on. > > Probably the most high profile Mercurial → Git switch has been the Go > project. > > The core of their rationale was workflow for pull request review and > acceptance. I suspect also that Google is trying to switch all their > work to Git. > Google policy is use Git Client with Perforce backend on all closed source artifacts, so I'm not surprised they are trying to keep their other project workflows similar... > > Go switched from a Google hosted Mercurial repository with Rietveld as > the review system, to a Google hosted Git repository mirrored on GitHub > with Gerrit as the review system. > > -- > Russel. > > ============================================================================= > Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: > sip:[email protected] > 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] > London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
