I think we have been advocating moving to Git from Mercurial. This does not mean moving from BitBucket to Github.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Jonathon Reinhart < [email protected]> wrote: > I know it's been stated that SCons wouldn't have to migrate the issue > tracker to GitHub as well. To any of those advocating for using GitHub for > code but not for issues, I'm just curious: do any of you use GitHub issue > tracking and pull requests frequently? I find the integration to be very > convenient and helpful (namely auto-cross references from code and PRs to > issues and vice-versa). TBH I'm not sure why you'd want to use anything > else (other than the pain of migration of existing images). > > Cheers, > > Jonathon > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:29 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I've used Jira before. I think it's alright, but perhaps a bit heavy >> weight. I'm up for anything as long as we are willing to commit to better >> task prioritization. I think bug triages stopped before I got here :) >> >> V/R, >> William >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> <random thoughts on bug trackers> >>> Honestly I'm surprised how much bug trackers are a religious >>> discussion... >>> For decade plus I've deployed bugzilla at almost every client. >>> >>> Jira seems to be the new hotness. >>> And of course there seem to many also ran's, and those integrated with >>> DVCS hosting (none of which are as good as bugzilla (IMHO)) >>> </random thoughts on bug trackers> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:46 PM, William Blevins <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Atlassian has Jira, so they aren't going to allow of easy integration >>>> of 3rd-party trackers. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected] >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Russel, >>>>> >>>>> Why stop looking at tigris? >>>>> >>>>> One other bonus to github is integration with things like readthedocs, >>>>> and other third party tools is either better or doesn't exist for >>>>> bitbucket >>>>> (at least last time I looked). >>>>> >>>>> -Bill >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 23:12 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >>>>>> > I am 1 of 2 people out of 11 who still prefer Mercurial. OMG. =) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I wonder why Mercurial is considered bad. Is it just a poor user >>>>>> > experience with BitBucket or there is something more in it? >>>>>> >>>>>> There is a lot about Mercurial (and Bazaar) that I like, especially >>>>>> command lines, etc. Despite years of improvement, the Git command line >>>>>> still seems something like a Perl script designed to replicate line >>>>>> noise. >>>>>> >>>>>> However for me, the Git wins are explicit remote tracking branches, so >>>>>> that you can see things in gitg, and the transitory nature of feature >>>>>> branches. I think I am echoing Bill here, but the fact that branch >>>>>> identifiers are immutable in Mercurial means that Bazaar wins. And >>>>>> Bazaar effectively got killed off when Canonical pulled the finance. >>>>>> >>>>>> I still use Mercurial somewhat for personal projects, but these are >>>>>> default branch only repositories. Much as I really dislike Git in so >>>>>> many ways, it is a better tool for serendipitous, feature branch >>>>>> based, >>>>>> multi-repository working. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for the GitHub vs BitBucket thing: now that BitBucket has switched >>>>>> to being a Git resource rather than a Mercurial resource, it is purely >>>>>> down to whether BitBucket pull requests system is better or worse than >>>>>> the GitHub one, and most importantly whether being on BitBucket or >>>>>> GitHub is better for marketing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apart from not working on Python 3.4+ as well as Python 2.7, SCons >>>>>> biggest problem is marketing. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for issues, I'm afraid I've stopped even looking at Tigris. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Russel. >>>>>> >>>>>> ============================================================================= >>>>>> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >>>>>> sip:[email protected] >>>>>> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >>>>>> >>>>> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
