+1. I'll see if I can get a python 3.5 buildbot slave up soon.
-Bill On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:01 AM, William Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Will try to do some more on this over the weekend. >> >> I got stuck on the weird os.mkinfo problem (still unsolved) and got a >> bit distracted by Me TV rewrite required to be ready soon so as to >> watch the 6 Nations games. New DVB-T2 USB sticks arriving tomorrow. >> >> On the really up-side, it appears that "futurize -1" is properly >> idempotent, making it a lot easier to work with than anything >> previously. >> >> Aim is still to get the code-base working properly, i.e passing all >> tests, as a Python 2.7 program, so that it can then become the default >> branch. My thinking here is that if we do not have a separate branch, >> but instead are evolving default to be Python 3 compatible as a Python >> 2.7 codebase then Python 3 usage will happen faster. The "down side" is >> that all Python 2 code must be written with Python 3 compliance from >> merge time on on, this includes all pull requests. >> >> -- >> Russel. >> >> ============================================================================= >> Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: >> sip:[email protected] >> 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] >> London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
