On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 10:01 -0800, Bill Deegan wrote: > Strange.. > > Here's the comment from blame. > r2061 | stevenknight | 2007-06-26 23:53:49 -0500 (Tue, 26 Jun 2007) | > 4 > lines Split test/AS/AS.py into sub-tests for the live assemblers it > tests. > Only test nasm for the known configuration of version 0.98* on a > 32-bit x86 system. > > Can you try removing that version check and see if it passes?
Edited out the version check…
…and the test fails to run as I am on x86_64.
Edited out the architecture check and the test fails:
Lots of compiler warnings of horrible code.
nasm appears to generate x86 code, so link fails.
Edited the eee Environment to add CCFLAGS='-m32' and LINKFLAGS='-m32':
Test passes.
I'd send in a pull request except that I bet hardwiring the CCFLAGS and
LINKFLAGS like this will cause many a test fail on non-GCC platforms.
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected]
41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
