On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 12:02 +0300, anatoly techtonik wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Russel Winder <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> > Pity HgView is a Qt application >> > rather than a GTK+ one: it looks horrible on my screen, especially >> > compared to gitg. >> >> Why no screens then?
Post screenshots if you want feedback on visual features. >> Also your assumption that tool defines the interface is wrong - it is >> designer who uses the tool who makes it beautiful. > > GUI applications present the interface the GUI designer/implementor > provides, amended only by any theming available at execution time. Qt > tools do not obey GTK+3 theming unless the Qt application designer > builds that in, which very few do. HgView is pure Qt, with no GTK+3 > capability. Qt allows to build beautiful interfaces. Don't you agree with that? >> > I still prefer the Git transient branch model to the Mercurial >> > persistent branch model. >> >> I also like rebasing Git branches, but this can kill history. >> Have you tried Evolve extension? And bookmarks? > > Except for using Git as a Subversion client, I avoid rebasing at all > times. You avoid rebasing in Git? Why? > I haven't tried Evolve, what is it? https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ChangesetEvolution > No I haven't played with > bookmarks, SCons is the only Mercurial repository I have where such a > thing might even be worth trying. Try it. But if you don't rebase... > Personally I'd rather use Git (on > BitBucket) so as to get proper feature branches. what's the point of "rather use Git" if you don't rebase? Do you use GitHub - is that the reason? -- anatoly t. _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
