I have built them in the past, and they worked if I had everything installed correctly.
I suppose that isn't my concern. I guess I am just worried about lots of file changes in docs due to the directory the the current developer builds the docs from. It just doesn't seem very professional if you look at the documentation across releases. On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi William, > > On 16.04.2016 15:30, William Blevins wrote: > >> Bill, >> >> It looks like the SCons 2.5.0 User Guide wasn't rebuilt on the release >> server because the examples have ptomulik in the directory >> paths. I'm not sure if this is an issue or not, but shouldn't our release >> system always regenerate the documentation? This is a bit >> worrisome because it suggests that documentation releases may be >> inconsistent. >> >> > I'm not sure what you mean by "release server". Can you clarify? > Have you tried building the docs yourself, and does it fail on your side > too? > > Best regards, > > Dirk > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
