On Tue, 2016-05-03 at 22:03 -0400, Bill Deegan wrote: > Jason, > > > I think the initial plan was to use six, and we've switched to > futurize. > Russel - Please correct if I'm incorrect.. >
Sounds right to me. General consensus amongst the Python folk I polled privately before deleting al the six stuff was that unless 2.5 and 2.6 were to be supported six was too heavyweight. With only 2.7 to support the future package is far more lightweight and provides fewer code differences. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
