> On May 9, 2016, at 12:39 , Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I understand that for you, and Tim, using git it would be less of a hindrance > to simply > "check in" the changes and extensions for SCons that you seem to have in the > hopper. > But I'm interested in increasing activity in the "long run" for the project. > ;) >
I’m absolutely not saying that scons should switch to git just to lower my activation energy (there’s not guarantee that I’d be able to contribute even if you did). I was just explaining why I’m having trouble contributing to the python 3 work. If it turns out that all the core developers are either ambivalent about it or pro-git then it probably would be a good thing to do in terms of lowering the barrier to entry for external contributors (but then in the current climate the github+git would be better for that than bitbucket+git). If the core developers are more comfortable with hg then it would seem a bit risky to switch. — Tim Jenness _______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
