Should we pre-populate with all the current scons docs? On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 12:22 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected]> wrote:
> Bill, > > On 31.07.2016 23:17, Bill Deegan wrote: > >> Dirk, >> >> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 6:53 AM, Dirk Bächle <[email protected] <mailto: >> [email protected]>> wrote: >> >> >> [...] >> >> We need someway to indicate on stackoverflow that this is the intent or >> we'll get mired in a confusing mass of people expecting all >> the documents to be in stackoverflow.. (Seeing this already).. >> >> >> > that's why new contributions and edits have to get approved first. And I > wouldn't mind having a parallel stream of docs and examples in > StackOverflow that we can directly refer to (or copy-paste nice examples > from). I guess I simply don't see the final scenario that you seem to be > concerned about. Can you be more specific? > > After all, this is just the start of the SO documentation...so I expect an > initial rush by a few contributors (early adopters), and after that it will > be up to us (the SCons team) to fill in most of the infos there. And > especially for the deep-knowledge parts there won't be a lot of people that > are capable of describing how things work, let alone having the time to do > so. > > And don't forget: every reference and mentioning of the keyword "SCons" on > the internet counts...this is really a kind of cheap PR for us if we manage > to keep the SO docs going. > > Best regards, > > Dirk > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
