Tom, Indeed.
I reviewed 344 again before I wasted anyone's time and found things that needed to be fixed :( The other is 345 (not 346); not sure how I managed to mess that up. https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/345/optimize-implicit-dependency-scan/diff V/R, William On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) < [email protected]> wrote: > #346 says 'no differences found'. > > Also I notice you have outstanding questions on 344 > > From: [email protected] At: 08/10/16 00:08:21 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re:[Scons-dev] Merging PR #344 && #346 > > Krew, > > Any odds of merging 344 & 346? > > https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/344/use- > set-where-it-is-applicable/diff > https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/346/check- > if-targets-have-changed-as-well-as/diff > > Both seem reasonable and I expect #346 to be high priority in the next > release. > > I realize we are supposed to be Python3-centric, but it would be nice to > take fixes as they come :) > > V/R, > William > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing > [email protected]https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
