Bill, Thanks! It should be self-contained.
V/R, William On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> wrote: > Was going to fix setup.py and release from rel_2.5.0 branch and then pull > that change over to trunk. > > Let me see if I can cherry pick that caching fix to the rel_2.5.0 branch > as well. > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 12:31 PM, William Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes, it's in the trunk. Are you releasing 2.5.0-2 from the trunk or from >> the 2.5.0 branch as a minor fix? >> >> https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/pull-requests/345/optimize >> -implicit-dependency-scan/diff >> >> V/R, >> William >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Did I merge that yet? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:00 AM, William Blevins <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Bill, >>>> >>>> Should we consider cherry-picking in the memoizing patch also, since >>>> this addresses some of the 2.5.0 performance questions? >>>> >>>> V/R, >>>> William >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Scons-dev mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Scons-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
