Thomas, I think you're change may have broken some tests. Can you look at the failures in: http://buildbot.scons.org/#/builders/10/builds/3/steps/1/logs/stdio
-Bill On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> wrote: > Thomas, > > Sorry looks like I missed that one when I re-cherry-picked. Just applied > your changes to repo. > Should be there now. > > -Bill > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Thomas Berg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Good stuff! >> >> I'm wondering if all the latest commits from the first repo made it into >> this last one though. As far as I can see, my pull request made it into the >> first repo, but is not present in the new one? >> >> Cheers, >> Thomas >> >> >> On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 9:31 PM, Bill Deegan <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Anatoly and Dirk pointed out that we could shrink the size of the repo, >>> thus speeding up cloning and reducing disk footprint and cloning time. >>> >>> So I've reconverted, re-cherry-picked changes from the first git repo, >>> deleted the second repo, created a third repo, pushed the update repo and >>> repopulated the wiki with content. >>> >>> Hopefully this is the last time. >>> >>> *The URL is the same, but I recommend re-forking on github and >>> discarding your local clones.* >>> >>> https://github.com/SConsProject/scons >>> >>> I'm 99.99% sure at this point that we've not lost any history, and have >>> the minimum size repo. >>> >>> Thanks for your patience! >>> -Bill >>> Co-Manager SCons Project >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Scons-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Scons-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list [email protected] https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
