On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 13:54 -0700, Bill Deegan wrote: > […] > > Regardless I think we've covered the bases in this discussion and > let's > revisit Jan 2019 to see what makes sense. > The thoughtful discussion is much appreciated!
In the end, SCons development must be a do-ocracy (an Apache concept I believe), in that those who actually do development stuff have vastly more votes than those who watch development. Obviously those who use and report back also must have a voice. -- Russel. =========================================== Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Scons-dev mailing list Scons-dev@scons.org https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev