On Tuesday 03 Dec 2002 13:09, David Marsh's list-reading hat wrote: > My 'objection' to PHP in this instance is not that it's a programming > language (most of these HTML preprocessors are programming languages of > a sort) but that (afaik) PHP 'needlessly' impedes cacheability of pages > that aren't "intrinsically" dynamic as each document is assembled on the > fly live on the server before being served, which will be an unnecessary > overhead for most documents that I will write (Having said that I will > be playing with PHP on some occasions, I am sure). This is why I would > prefer a system that I can preprocess locally and then upload (static) > changes to the server.
PHPA works great. Main problem with totally dynamic commercial sites is that they tend to be invisible to search engines. -- ray _______________________________________________ Scottish mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
