yup.. each subnet would need to be isolated except for the proxy.. in terms of clients on each sub.. a max of 3 at any one time and once in place they will remain static.. i would propose to put them on the same ethernet segment unless this is not such a good idea..
Colin McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote .. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >I have a simple query here that someone might be able to help me with. > I have a lInux Server (SuSE) with Squid running on 192.168.10.1.. I have > windows clients that access the outside world thru' the proxy but would > now like to split the clients into three separate networks.. I know I > can just change the workgroup name but want to be able to hide all services > on each of the three networks but still allow access to all thru'' the > proxy server.. is this possible without compromising the integrity of > the individual win networks.. > > > Yes. You could keep the same IP addresses and set the scope id (1). Or > you could use three ip subnets and set up ip aliases on the interface of > the proxy (2). Or you could use subnets and three seperate network cards > (3). Or you could set up routers to converge the subnets onto the proxy > (4). If I spent some more time thinking about it, there are probably > other ways of doing it as well (OK so (1) is a bit silly). Are they > running on the same phyiscal ethernet segment? Are individual machines > likely to move between subnets? Is each sub-net to be completely > isolated apart from the shared proxy (no common printers / PDCs / mail > server / ...?) ? Is network bandwidth an issue? Number of clients? > > Colin > > > _______________________________________________ > Scottish mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
