fine here too (which is good, considering how, well, "esoteric" Lotus Notes
can be at times ;o)

Ben Thorp



                                                                                       
                                                 
                      Graeme Thomson                                                   
                                                 
                      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>        To:       SLUG-list <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>                                 
                      Sent by:                        cc:                              
                                                 
                      [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Subject:  Re: [Scottish] Mailing list 
changes                                     
                      .lug.org.uk                                                      
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 
                      11-12-03 07:12                                                   
                                                 
                      Please respond to                                                
                                                 
                      SLUG-list                                                        
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 
                                                                                       
                                                 



well, it appears to work perfectly fine here. assuming this goes to the
list, i'm happy

G
On 11 Dec 2003, at 03:12, Kyle Gordon wrote:

> Hey all,
>
> I've made some changes to the list options that should fix the
> reply-to issues we've been having. If someone wants to give it another
> test, on you go ;-)
>
> Currently mailman will not strip and replace any existing reply-to
> headers, this can be a good
> (http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html) thing and a bad
> (http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml) thing, and can be
> changed if required.
>
> Regards
>
> Kyle
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scottish mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
>


_______________________________________________
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish




_______________________________________________
Scottish mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish

Reply via email to