William Anderson wrote: > > Willie wrote: > > [snip] > > > > Latest news is that wikipedia have reached their target, however there are > > plenty of other worthy projects. > > chucking money on a semi-routine basis at FSF, Mozilla Foundation and > SourceForge would seem the most project-neutral way to do this, i.e. Q4 > FSF, Q1 Mozilla, Q2 SF, Q3 ScotLUG Xmas Night Out Beer Fund. > I think I'd suggested making something like a shortlist each month, and then taking a final vote on 'the one' at every meeting. Obviously this entails finding out who has voted etc. Maybe it could be done in such a way that a shortlist of 5 (for example) is made up, and as people donate, they vote. This gives those who donate the right to vote, and avoids any nasty situations.
Further thoughts? Kyle > -- > _ __/| ___ ___ __ _________ "When Microsoft Office is your only hammer, > \`O_o' / _ \/ -_) // / __/ _ \ pretty much everything begins to look like > =(_ _)=/_//_/\__/\_,_/_/ \___/ a nail. Or a thumb." -- Rob Pegoraro > U - Ack! Phttpt! Thhbbt! neuro at well dot com http://neuro.me.uk/ > > _______________________________________________ > Scottish mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish _______________________________________________ Scottish mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
