Ive been following the thread, i made sure i read it right from the start before replying.
i didnt add any fuel, just pointing out it was a useless argument thats probably appeared on this mailing list a few times and never ever ends well, no matter what the original subject was about, and i did offer some advice to the original party, I.E. " If you take the time and learn how to install Linux software correctly without RPM, Debs etc you'll have a much greater chance of working out what goes wrong when dependencies fail with an RPM. " which was my homage to the original subject matter, then i went on to explain why my opinion was formed in this way, Then i replied to the subject matter at hand Which IMO still isnt a subject that is approached well at any time when people really get attached to one or the other, it only ever ends with tears. If you took my email as a personal insult :) sorry, wasnt intended to be. It was just to try and stop this before it Does actually get out of hand and the list admins end up just dumping any future replies anyway L8tr Charles McCrimmon (Specis) **Note To self, Fix time on system ** On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 23:57, TC wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 00:30, Charles McCrimmon wrote: > > anyway, i was just mailing to say i think this is nutz havin a public > > argument/discussion about windows Vs Linux on a Lug mailing list utterly > > nutz :D > > a. It stemmed from a discussion about RPMs on Linux > b. It's still about Linux (albeit compared with Windows) > c. It has raised discussion from other participants > and > d. Even you couldn't resist adding your 2p's worth > > Doesn't sound nutz to me. > > Or maybe you think it it should be taken to > alt.swedish-chef.bork.bork.bork? > > :-) > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > Scottish mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish > > _______________________________________________ Scottish mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
