> Kyle Gordon wrote: [trimmed] > > Top posting worked just fine in that context due to the reply not > > addressing any part of the post in particular. > > TOP POSTING NEVER WORKS FINE. > > A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. > Q. Why is top posting bad?
While top posting is evil in general, in this case it was more like: statement: a style of post is bad example: the quoted post So the logical sequence was correct. C (No generalisation is ever correct; including this one) _______________________________________________ Scottish mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/scottish
