You should be able to see it in SVN. Like for SCOUT-15: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
Hope that helps. --Kurt Lin Sun wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > I looked at them, I think most of them sounds minor fixes, and should > not impact us. However, I haven't been able to figure out how to > tell which revision is associated with JIRA yet. I'd like to do that > if there is an easy way to. > > I think [SCOUT-15] is fixed in trunk. > > Lin > > Kurt T Stam wrote: >> Hi Lin, >> >> If you have time maybe you can take a look at >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-42 >> >> --Kurt >> >> Lin Sun wrote: >>> Hi Kurt, >>> >>> That sounds great for me. 1.0rc1 is good and we can test it in our >>> env. Let me know if there is anything I can do to help out. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Lin >>> >>> Kurt T Stam wrote: >>>> Hi Lin, >>>> >>>> I'm also interested in a build for Scout in roughly the same >>>> time-frame. >>>> >>>> We currently have three issues in jira: >>>> >>>> SCOUT-38 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> Produce >>>> website from the maven2 build >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-38> >>>> Not related to the code, but I'm working on it and it's almost done >>>> anyway >>>> >>>> SCOUT-14 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> Binaries >>>> from >>>> download are empty <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-14> >>>> Not related to the code, This should be fixed when SCOUT-38 is done. >>>> >>>> SCOUT-12 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> Implement >>>> the >>>> Asynchronous Registry Request Feature >>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCOUT-12> >>>> Seems like no one is jumping to get this implemented. >>>> >>>> So I would be actually be fine with a 1.0 build now :). Should we vote >>>> on doing a 1.0rc1? >>>> >>>> Input still welcome:). >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> --Kurt >>>> >>>> p.s. As a side note, maybe we can follow it up by a 1.1 version in the >>>> August time frame that supports JAXB on top the XMLBean UDDIv2 >>>> binding. >>>> I'm currently working on that in my workspace to see what it takes and >>>> it takes a bit of moving code around between classes to make that >>>> work. >>>> (I'm also doing this work so we can add a UDDI v3 binding). >>>> >>>> Lin Sun wrote: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to let y'all know that Apache Geronimo is working towards >>>>> our >>>>> 2.0 release and the projects goals for 2.0 are to ship scout as the >>>>> JAXR 1.0 implementation. So far we are doing well with JAXR tck in >>>>> geronimo by using the latest scout snapshot and would very much like >>>>> to include scout in our 2.0 release. >>>>> >>>>> To plan better I'd like to know what the next version of Scout (1.0?) >>>>> release plans are. we'd like to get Apache Geronimo 2.0 out around >>>>> the end of July. >>>>> >>>>> Input welcome :) >>>>> >>>>> Lin >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
