That one is just a development repository. The actual packages are in Fedora proper, they get downloaded automatically if you use yum to install (similar to apt-get):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/squeak-vm The latest seems to be 3.10.5 according to Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7779 which should be fine (except for the missing Scratch-specific plugins). Btw, are you going to package the Scratch Sugar activity too? Many Sugar activities are packaged already: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/list/?searchwords=sugar* - Bert - On 23.03.2010, at 15:29, Amos Blanton wrote: > I've never worked with any of these - so Bert's recommendation sounds best to > me. > http://code.google.com/p/squeak-fedora/downloads/list > > However, on that page I only see SRPMs - I guess you'd want to depend on just > a plain old RPM? Most of my linux experience is in the realm of Ubuntu / > Debian based systems, so I don't know how the Fedora rpm repository system > works, or if you can just declare dependencies and have the system > automagically download / install them for you. What would you recommend, Bert? > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:40 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Kevin, > > > > Ah - as Bert said, it would be better to depend on a shared squeak-vm rpm. > > It would be good to test things out first, but it should work. We bundled > > our own with the ubuntu version because the one available for us to depend > > on in the Ubuntu repository had a very old bug. But we'd prefer to do > > things > > right, and probably will when the Ubuntu vm gets updated. > > > > Ok. This weekend I'll pull together an RPM that doesn't have the vm > included and will require the squeak_vm. Do you know which version or rpm > is needed? > > ./ks > > > >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~scratch Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~scratch More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
