On 05/05/2011 10:42 AM, Diane Holt wrote:
This time, I didn't get any of that. There's
no error in the make output, there's just no mention of those things at
all. I also just noticed that, while I do have a device_tools subdir,
there's no Makefile in it. There's one in meta/device_tools, but not in
sb-toolchain-extras/device_tools (just a category.mk
<http://category.mk>). Is there supposed to be one? If there is, where's
it supposed to come from? If there isn't supposed to be, can you think
of any reason why this stuff didn't get built? (FTR, I'm running the
foreign-toolchain process on a linaro 4.5.3 arm.)
All the new output from sb-toolchain-extras should go to
/scratchbox/device_tools/toolname-version/new-compiler
/scratchbox/compilers/new-compiler
or their subdirectories.
There's a fair bit of residual makefiles that come from original
toolchain-extras, so maybe you've run a wrong target and/or you've run
make in a wrong subdirectory?
As suggested by the wiki the process should be something like this
% make CONFIG=meta/alien-tc/myconf.conf -C meta/alien-tc all-sums
% make CONFIG=meta/alien-tc/myconf.conf -C meta/alien-tc
and for packaging
make CONFIG=meta/alien-tc/myconf.conf VERSION=1.0.22 all-packages
where version is usually sb-toolchain-extras-version, or some arbitrary
version number you'd like to assign to the packages (the packaging
version comes from the toolchain config).
I have a packaging somewhere of the linaro gcc-4.5 2011.04 and as far as
I recall, it used to package just fine.
Regards,
Jussi
_______________________________________________
Scratchbox-users mailing list
Scratchbox-users@lists.scratchbox.org
http://lists.scratchbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scratchbox-users
