On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 09:31:06PM +0000, bill wrote:
> Here's a patch against 4.0.2 that includes resizing for 'Q'. That's
> the easiest resize
> of course, but I don't yet see that the others will be that difficult to
> do.
No, it's not very difficult. It's just a bit of work. How does your
patch deal with multiple horizontal/vertical Combinations, e.g. when
your screen looks like:
+------------------------------+
+ | +
+ | +
+ |--------------+
+ | | +
+ | | +
+------------------------------+
> I'm hoping to
> get some time to look at it this week. I have a really mundane
> question, though...
> Is there an easier way to do these patches? I'm maintaining my
> developmental
> directory, in which I've made massive formatting changes and notes and
> comments, etc,
That's exactly why there's no public writable cvs, because I don't
want massive formating changes. ;-)
Notes and comments are always welcome, though.
> where I dig around and figure out how things work, and I don't want to
> make diffs against
> that, since there are huge amounts of white space, &c changes. When I've
> got code that does work,
Just don't change the white space...
> I get 2 fresh copies of the original source, make the changes in one
> (I'm trying to maintain
> the style of the surrounding code, and apologize when I get it wrong;
> except that
> I prefer using functional declarations with types in the parameter
> list...if no one objects
> I'd prefer to continue doing that),
No, please stay K&R conform. I don't see why we should stop to
support it, it doesn't slow down the compiled code.
> Also, this patch is against the original 4.0.2, rather than an incremental
> patch against the vert_split_diff that I put out earlier this evening.
> Is that the
> right way to go? or should I send incremental patches?
Depends. In the current case (as I haven't applied your patch to
the current code yet) I prefer a patch against the old version.
But once it's applied an incremental diff is nicer ;-)
I'm also not sure if I should wait for a complete implementation
or not. What are your feelings about this?
> The more I get into this code, the more I like it. It's a very nice
> design.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Michael.
--
Michael Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);}
_______________________________________________
screen-users mailing list
screen-users@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
