Hi Paul, Wow, lbxproxy really is a significant performance improvement! I just gave it a try and I can really tell the difference.
Thanks for the tip! -Adam On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 19:24:25 +0000, "Paul Ackersviller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > While I didn't start using lbxproxy(1), the Low BandWidth X proxy, for > this purpose, I've discovered quite by accident that it mostly solves > this problem for me. I always use DISPLAY=:63 via starting a wm like > > lbxproxy & sleep 1; fvwm -display :63 & _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
