-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Some years ago, I tried several Linux-Distros (Debian, SuSe, Fedora) and found > the initial .screenrc-configuration-file quite, umm, minimalistic. > (I don't know if that is still the case? Can anyone confirm?)
I think the main problem with this discussion is no one really has a particularly clear understanding of what it is we're talking about having. At least, I know I don't. I think it'd be more fruitful to mention specific deficiencies or improvements that may be made to the current example screenrc and/or etc/screenrc (from our sources, obviously, and not any that might be packager-specific). A diff against the currently-shipped screenrc, or even a wholly new one, with justifications for why it's an improvement over its predecessor, would help greatly. - -- Micah J. Cowan Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer. GNU Maintainer: wget, screen, teseq http://micah.cowan.name/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFI5ADC7M8hyUobTrERAoP0AJ9C1oa/j0BqxojIx83xD2XlYI/VuQCfYhgo TnS3upaJeVSOlfyq5QzO5MY= =qmme -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ screen-users mailing list screen-users@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/screen-users
