Craig Bradney wrote: >On Tuesday 14 December 2004 01:16, Gregory Pittman wrote: > > >>Craig Bradney wrote: >> >> >>>Please read the mailing list....... >>> >>>HOWEVER.. we might have it back up very soon.. >>> >>>Craig >>> >>>On Monday 13 December 2004 13:22, donnyp wrote: >>> >>> >>>>sorry to bug you with newbie questions: >>>>I have not been able to get the latest work via cvs >>>>It was working ok up till the end of November >>>> >>>> >>I don't know much about cvs, but I wonder if there is a way to have it >>spit out more informative error messages when it's not working. >> >> > >Not sure, but you would think that the fact we have stated at least 15 times >the status of CVS, and the fact we are updating a tarball nightly might be a >big enough hint. > > > What you would think, what I would think, but it seems unlikely that we've seen our last 'whassup?' question about cvs.
Greg
