>>Hi Christoph, >> >>at least for the German users, I read from the latest DIN 5008 that >>it is definitely "allowed" to write 10.000 OR 10 000 up to taste. >> >>Got this info from working at office's April issue. They had it in >>connection with currency, however, i. e. 10.000,00 EUR or 10 000,00 >>EUR. >> >>Anyway, these are just recommendations, and as far as I know, in >>normal thinking countries (i. e. countries != Germany) they are >>taken for that :-) >> >>Rolf > >Hi Rolf, > >the problem in Germany is, that the "rules" (better: guidelines) for >offices and businesses on the one hand and for the "black art" on >the other are different. I found the 1000/10 000 "rule" in some >typography manuals (a DIN doesn't care about aesthetics). > >I didn't know them before and no one ever complained. But I have to >say that numbers in a text which is supposed to be read (book, >magazine) really look better in typographical style. I think if >you're in DTP, people expect you to make a difference and they want >a result which looks better than something written by a clerk with a >certain word processing software.
I agree. Plus, numbers have different meanings and thus end up typed different ways. The use of dots, commas, spaces, variable or fixed spaces, dash, etc. all depend upon what use is made of these numbers, what do they represent. A "phone" number is not the same as a "value" number, for instance. A date is not the same as a value either. A street number neither. And so on. Basically, typography can achieve with lots more subtlety the transposition on paper of these differences. And this is also, as you point out, a big difference between what a word processor and a DTP app can achieve. Not to forget the "human factor". The knowledge of the tool plus the knowledge of the rules (or guidelines or usage) both make a big difference between a nice and raffined typographic work and an ordinary publication. I hope you end up finding what you need. There are numerous books and sites on typography. I think the best approach would be to find at least a few reliable sources (2 being the minimum) and see on what do they agree. Sometimes it's very difficult to find a rule as such for a very specific issue. Then, usage can help and I would also suggest looking at "serious" or "renowned" publications to see what they've come up with in these cases. It must be aknowledged that some typographic rules have been widely forgotten (or dismissed) because of the limitations of big DTP apps that have implemented so badly the use of typographic spaces, as an example. When we get there, I'm sure Scribus will do better on that field as well. Louis > >Christoph > >_______________________________________________ >Scribus mailing list >Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de >http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus
