On Monday 18 April 2005 10:37 pm, Gregory Pittman wrote: > Marvin Dickens wrote: > >I might add (Depends on your point of view...) that it's never a good idea > > to use gpl fonts to produce internal company documents of any kind. > > You know, I just have a hard time with statements like this...sort of > like trying to envision the GPL Police storming into your company and > demanding all of your documents!? Marvin, I think maybe you need to get > more sleep.
Greg, You are certainly entitled to your opinion. However, I take exception to statements like "you need to get more sleep". This is my opinion and I stand by it. Also, in the event you think our worry (My employer) is based on "gpl police" - whatever or whoever you think they are, you are mistaken. But, then again, the nature of our concerns are not yours - you don't even know what the nature of our business is. When I made the assertion that started this thread, you and others challenged me to produce reasonable and plausable documentation to back up my statement. I did. Therefore, I challenge you to provide the same type of documentation stating that I have no worries. I could await your post, but unless the fsf changes the licensing right now - I'd be waiting for something you cannot possibly produce. Also, FWIW, I wish I had never started this thread. I should have kept it to myself and avoided the grief. My days of posting to this list are over. People like you make it a big pain in the ass. Regards Marvin
