On Wed, 2005-02-16 at 10:15 +0100, Peter Nermander wrote: > For viewing, nothing can beat a plain image format (TIFF, PNG?)
I can't entirely agree with that. A raster image will give you finite-resolution on the vector parts of the document such as text and line art. Sometimes this is a significant problem. It also means that the viewer can't do things like optimise text rendering and scaling for the display and current viewing resolution. -- Craig Ringer
