Gregory Pittman a ?crit : > Christopher Anthony wrote: > >>I very much disagree and am dissapointed... > > On a personal note, it's a matter of convenience when I'm at work with > my dual-boot Linux-WinXP system to be able to use Scribus on WinXP while > I'm "trapped" there, to open and modify Scribus files I've made on Linux. > It would be nice for some to get so attached to Scribus they can't do > without it, and this way the OS isn't a barrier. > > Greg > _______________________________________________ > Scribus mailing list > Scribus at nashi.altmuehlnet.de > http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/mailman/listinfo/scribus > > I do agree with the fact that Scribus on Windows is very good, first of all because many people are going to know about it, but, in the other hand, I have to admit that I went to Linux *only* fot getting Scribus - and I think that if I had to to the choice today I might have kept Windows, which would have been sad. Because I'm very happy being on Linux, even it takes many many time... (And for instance, at the time I thought I would go to Linux on the 4th computer at Le Tigre, the Win version arrived - so we stayed on Win (and by the way the compatibility is great: I make some leading pages fot the "bas de pages" and they can go easily from Linux to Win).)
So Scribus on Win is goot, but Scribus on Linux is better ;) Raphael
