Gregory Pittman napisa??(a): > I've read the article in TUX, alleged to be in-depth. Just consider the > fact that the article consists of 5 of these odd-sized pages TUX is put > on, that three of the five have screenshots taking up over half the > space, and the other two have screenshots taking up about 1/4 to 1/3. > > In this article, there is much time spent on loading additional fonts, > the rest on making a PDF form, and the latter keeps referring back to > the Scribus website. As with most writing in TUX, all of which comes > from writers who seem to number fewer than the digits on your hand, we > seem to have better writing in English from many of the non-native > English speakers on this list -- strange word choice and placement, > commas appearing randomly in sentences. > > In short, TUX is a reasonably attractive online magazine with at best > weak content. Not that I have an opinion about it. >
100% agreed. Judging by their flamboyant title, I hoped for much, much more. Instead, they just reused this ugly sample PDF form, I'd created 3 (sic!) years ago for my PDF form tutorial. I badly miss the "in-depth" part :) cheers Maciej ___________________________________________________________ Der fr?he Vogel f?ngt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de
