Le Mon, 4 Dec 2006 09:58:07 -0800 (PST), wtb41 <wtb at hal-pc.org> m'a transmis le message suivant :
> > Craig Ringer wrote: > >I don't think that's really true except on Mac OS 9 with a font > >manager like Suitcase or ATM installed. Most other OSes don't really > >draw the distinction to the same extent. > > My reply: The System fonts v. Personal font division exists on my > Linux system. For example, > when I enter fonts:/ into Konqueror's location bar, I immediately am > presented with a menu > with 2 options: (1) fonts:/Personal/ and (2) fonts:/System/. > Furthermore, the font installer that > is part of the KDE package also has that dichotomy. One needs SU > status to install system fonts. Because there are fonts installed in ~/.fonts on which you have "read" and "write" perms and there in some other locations where youjust have "read" permissions. The first are you're personnal fonts. -- Pierre Marchand JabberId : capparis at im.apinc.org Dec 4 20:16:51 localhost imapd: LOGIN, user=pierre, ip=[::ffff:127.0.0.1], protocol=IMAP
