On Friday 27 January 2006 11:30, John Jordan wrote: > On 27 Jan 2006, at 9:56, Petr Van k wrote: > > interesting. Do you have any cases about it? > > > > I've found just some obscure issues like: > > http://www.uiowa.edu/~anthro/news95/careers.htm > > > > actually I don't care about it much but I'm always fascinated a little > > bit in these parts of civilization... > > Thanks for posting that link. Now everyone can see what the issue > is and make their own decisions. > > Yes, I do personally have issues with SIL, but discussion of such > opinions are totally off-topic, so I will not state more than that.
Gang, just for the record, Fundamentalists think that Wycliffe is a godless liberal organization. They really aren't Fundamentalist in any historical understanding of the word. As suggested in this e-mail, that's an off-list conversation. I just wanted to bring a point of clarification. SIL is extremely important for scholarly work with both Biblical and other Ancient Near Eastern texts (Akkadian, Uggaritic, etc...) - without their fonts people in these fields would be stuck many years outside the PC revolution (I've got a grammar that's pre-SIL - YICK). Wes
