> > What is the reason that text boxes aren't suitable to provide the appropriate columns, rows and > > spacings in the discussion thread. > > > > Discussions like this one always come down to effectiveness or > productivity. The less you have to do to achieve your layout, the less > time it takes. Drawing, manipulating, resizing, placing any object on > the page take an amount of time. When you multiply the objects, you > multiply the time. When you then change your mind and have to re-edit, > you can suddenly discover that it would have been easier if things have > been done another way. >
This is the reason I posed the question. I am working on a book layout that requires a change from one column to two columns and back to one column at irregular intervals throughout. I did the original layout using linked text frames. But the project supervisor decided to make changes, lots of changes to the copy, to the type size, even to the page dimensions. These changes did not come to me all at once. He requested a different change with each new draft. So I have resized these text frames more times than I can count. Had the copy had come to me fully edited, and had the layout originally discussed proved satisfactory, text frames would have been adequate. But working for people who fail to appreciate the concept, "Measure twice, cut once," having the option of multiple columns and rows that flow with the story would save me a lot of grief and time. (I provided an original sample page that was approved. It wasn't until I completed the layout that I heard, "Well, on second thought....") Best, Ron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://nashi.altmuehlnet.de/pipermail/scribus/attachments/20061027/26c287bf/attachment.html
