On Friday 27 April 2007 04:53, Craig Bradney wrote: > > > Justification has been improved in 1.3.4cvs. I agree, before > > > that it > > looked > > > > awful. > > > > Nice to hear that. I understand 1.3.4 is a development branch, > > and users are usually discouraged to use it for major projects. > > My question is: if I have no deadlines in the near future and I > > can live with minor glitches or headaches and take some > > precautions (like having to patch the program from time to time, > > putting my sla files under revision control), is it ok to use > > this branch for real work? Are there any plans to introduce major > > changes to the file format or anything that breaks forward > > compatibility of the sla files? > > There is no reason you cannot use 1.3.4 however you have to accept > the consequences. It has a LOT of changes.. really.. a huge number! > > It is better in sooo many ways over 1.3.3.x, however, when you use > it, you are a tester, so you need to be sure that if you go to > print with things from it, you need to be sure you get proofs > before printing a big run of documents. > > Craig
I am takng the plunge. With respect to the specific features relating to text handling, where is the best source for infomation? The manual? A Wiki article? -- John Culleton Able Indexing and Typesetting Precision typesetting (tm) at reasonable cost. Satisfaction guaranteed. http://wexfordpress.com
