Matt Gushee wrote: > Actually, I think you might want to try a *lower* resolution. Sounds > counterintuitive, but think about it: if you set your screen size to, > say, 800x600, then all your windows appear larger on the screen, and > more physical pixels are used to display each item.
Oh, wait. I guess your screen-shot application only recognizes the X-server pixels, not the hardware ones, so it wouldn't make any difference ... though if you could rig your PrintScreen key to dump to a file instead of the printer, that might work. -- Matt Gushee : Bantam - lightweight file manager : matt.gushee.net/software/bantam/ : : RASCL's A Simple Configuration Language : matt.gushee.net/rascl/ :
