jon skrev: > Forget about my last post - please. I was a little confused by ... > something > Your tiff and png seem to be allright. Sorry. > > I converted one of your pdf (the one for screen) wich has 300 dpi images > (one was not - but I think this might be ignorable) to no > transparencies and > to cmyk (ISO coated FOGRA 27). > One font was not included in the pdf. > And there is at least one kerning() problem with the ISSN number. > > One of the pictures seem to be compressed with LZW - this is, afaik, > not allowed within PDF 1.3/1.4. > > Please check the pdf, if you like, if it compares to your needs. > > http://www.jonhagen.de/trans/test.pdf [ 9 mb ]
Yes, it has a flaw on the issn-line, and it seems the fonts are not ok, strange though as I asked all the font to be included and have used them in print before ... > Allow a few minutes to upload. > Please don't use this as a print pdf - I didn't crosschecked the file > after converting and one font is missing. > It's just for, hmmpf, fun. You might be able to verify how it might > look if converted a little more reliable. > Jon well, actually my pdf looks better on my machine :-P -- in my acrobat reader on Kubutu, that is. What does my http://www.bojer.no/Ariadne2006/ariadnes_aarbok2006-omslag-TilTrykking-BareEttBilde.pdf look like on your machine? Greyish?? Font problems? If it is not to difficult: Could you open it in Acrobat reader and make a small screenshot (or describe what you see)? Would be of help to understand a bit more of this mystery :P > Am 05.02.2007 um 21:36 schrieb jon: > >> Am 05.02.2007 um 21:07 schrieb Axel Bojer: >> >>> How? The image is totally flattende and looks quite as it should be, >>> quite the way I made it in Scribus. All my problems would be solved if >>> this file could be made cmyk and still be printed the way this file >>> looks on the screen. No transparency in this file at all, no layers no >>> nothing, just plain png -- made tiff by Gimp. I will try Imagemagick, >>> perhaps that will be a help. (...)
