Gregory Pittman <gpittman at ...> writes: > > John Brown wrote: > > ... > > Why are all these gymnastics necessary? No extra space is added at the top > > of > > the frame, so why is it added at the bottom? > > > ... > > In the end, it has to do with how much space is assigned > above and below the baseline for a given font, so you don't run the risk > of chopping of tops or bottoms of characters. > > Greg >
I used the 2-frame solution, and I am happy. I accept that it was a design decision, but I do not understand the justification. If a character is truncated , it is a simple matter to make your frame a little larger. Anyway, another poster said that it is fixed in 1.3.4, but I probably won't switch because it is the (very?) unstable version.
